Health effects associated with chewing tobacco: a Burden of Proof study
This study synthesizes existing evidence regarding the health impacts of chewing tobacco while accounting for various sources of uncertainty.
This study synthesizes existing evidence regarding the health impacts of chewing tobacco while accounting for various sources of uncertainty.
Compare strength of evidence for health risks and outcomes.
We analysed results from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 to inform cancer control planning efforts globally.
View and download estimates of the world’s health from 1990 to 2021.
Here we show that comprehensive tobacco control policies—including smoking bans, health warnings, advertising bans and tobacco taxes—are effective in reducing smoking prevalence; amplified positive effects are seen when these policies are implemented simultaneously within a given country.
The present study sought to analyze smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable mortality estimates produced by the 2017 Global Burden of Disease Study for Brazil, 26 states, and the Federal District.
Inspect current and past trends in tobacco use across Mexico.
This booklet provides an overview of all findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study, published in The Lancet.
The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 comparative risk assessment (CRA) is a comprehensive approach to risk factor quantification that offers a useful tool for synthesizing evidence on risks and risk-outcome associations. With each annual GBD study, we update the GBD CRA to incorporate improved methods, new risks and risk-outcome pairs, and new data on risk exposure levels and risk-outcome associations.
The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of risk factor exposure and attributable burden of disease. By providing estimates over a long time series, this study can monitor risk exposure trends critical to health surveillance and inform policy debates on the importance of addressing risks in context.